<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>RLV and Space Transport News</title>
    <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/</link>
    <description>News on space transport and the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
    <language>en-us</language>           
    <generator>Nucleus CMS v3.24</generator>
    <copyright>©</copyright>             
    <category>Weblog</category>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    
    <item>
 <title>Blog update...</title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=62</link>
<description><![CDATA[After messing around with MySQL and other misc. stuff on and off for the pass week or so, it appears I've finally gotten the blog at the original address <a href="http://www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php">www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php</a> up to normal speed. So I'm redirecting RLVNews.com and SpaceTransportNews.com back to that address. If you are using one of those two URLs to come to this blog, you don't have to change anything. <br />
<br />
I'll keep the "temporary" site <a href="http://www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus324 /index.php">www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus324 /index.php</a> active indefinitely since there are external links to its postings. However, I will turn off comments and insert forwarding addresses back to the standard site, where I've been mirroring all of my posts. (I will try to copy all the comments over from the temp site a well.)]]></description>
 <category>General</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=62</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 8 Feb 2008 15:58:20 -0700</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Briefs: Public interest in spaceflight; Air Racing and RRL</title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=61</link>
<description><![CDATA[I don't take this sort of poll too seriously since  the general public is generally not well informed about real (vs. sci-fi) spaceflight: <A HREF="http://www.abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/story?id=4255841&page=1" target="_d">Four in 10 Would Book a Flight to Moon: Most Americans Think Ordinary People Will Travel in Outer Space in the Years Ahead - ABC News - Feb.8.08</A>.  When there are commercial human spaceflight systems like SpaceShipTwo in routine operation, people will be able to see and grasp what spaceflight is all about. Polling on public interest in going on such flights will then make sense. <br />
<br />
On the other hand, the positive view towards spaceflight in general as seen in such polls is encouraging. After all, a commercial spaceflight industry can thrive even with a participation of only 0.1% of the US population (i.e. ~300k people). <br />
===<br />
The <a href="http://www.redbullairrace.com/" target="_d">Red Bull Air Racing</a> program seems to be going along quite well: <A HREF="http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?contentBlockId=8a84f190-7a6b-4aad-b9f1-f7dd9b088698" target="_d">Red Bull Air Races Coming To Midwest: Detroit, San Diego Will Host Event In 2008 - Aero-News Network - Feb.8.08</A>. This should obviously be encouraging for the <a href="http://www.rocketracingleague.com" target="_d">Rocket Racing League</a>, which, I'm sure, is looking for a major title sponsor like Red Bull.]]></description>
 <category>NewSpace</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=61</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:45:53 -0700</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Briefs: More Atlas V/Bigelow discussion [Update]; Conspiracies vs. flawed plans</title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=60</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jon Goff follows up on his comments in the <a href="http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn13290-no-major-hurdles-to-upgrade-atlas-v-rockets-for-people.html" target="_d">New Scientist article</a> about a crew capable version of the Atlas V: <A HREF="http://selenianboondocks.blogspot.com/2008/02/lmbigelow-atlas-v-deal.html" target="_d">LM/Bigelow Atlas V Deal - Selenian Boondocks</A>.<br />
<br />
I agree that the Atlas V may not dramatically lower launch costs but the Bigelow arrangement shows that with a high flight rate even this vehicle can make good progress in that direction. Ticket prices for a Bigelow habitat stay will start off at $15M but should come down, especially when a crew capable Falcon 9/Dragon becomes available. The existence of a robust launch rate would also help other companies attract investment for development of new vehicles, particularly refuel-and-fly RLVs. These vehicles will lower costs even more and this in turn will help drive up the launch rate further. Etc, etc.<br />
<br />
The important thing is to get this positive feedback loop going and Bigelow's willingness to risk his own money is key. <br />
<br />
A lunar exploration program that drove launch rates even higher would also contribute greatly to this process but unfortunately NASA's current plan does nothing of the sort. <br />
<br />
[Update: Rand Simberg comments on all this: <a href="http://www.transterrestrial.com/archives/2008/02/more_fur_on_the_1.html" target="_d">More Fur On The Dinosaurs - Transterrestrial Musings</a>]<br />
===<br />
Instead, Mike Griffin suggests Lockheed Martin is behind all the anti-Ares talk: <A HREF="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/02/08/ares-complaints-blame-lockheed/" target="_d">Ares complaints: blame Lockheed? - Space Politics</A>.  <br />
<br />
I would say good for LM if it is true. Building two new expendables while there are two underused EELVs is absurd and the more this news gets out, the better. However, I doubt that LM is leading any anti-Ares conspiracy.  LM will be getting billions for the Orion capsule and undercutting Ares will also threaten that program. <br />
<br />
The fundamental problem is Griffin's insistence on building new launchers to fit his exploration architecture rather than fitting an architecture to existing launchers (and to soon-to-be-existing ones like Falcon 9). Yes, a robust lunar program might require development of some new technology slightly beyond what's currently on the shelf such as fuel depots and in-space refueling but that is what we should expect an R&D agency to do. The next time NASA astronauts go to the Moon, they should get there via a program that actually advances the state of the art of spaceflight rather than via a retro-architecture that "proves" to everyone yet again how impractical and unsustainable human spaceflight is.<br />
]]></description>
 <category>NASA Exploration Systems</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=60</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:22:56 -0700</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Briefs: Virginia spaceflight legislation update; Google X PRIZE website</title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=59</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jack Kennedy reports on efforts to make space tourism operations in Virginia as liability friendly as possible: <A HREF="http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2008/02/virginia-spaceflight-liability-immunity.html" target="_d">Va. Spaceflight Liability & Immunity Act Becoming More "Bullet Proof" - Spaceports - Feb.7.08</A><br />
===<br />
Will Pomerantz reports on mods to the <A HREF="http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/" target="_d">Google Lunar X PRIZE website</A> and then goes on to discuss panorama shot-making and a cool robot arm project: <A HREF="http://www.xprize.org/blogs/wpomerantz/site-redesign-panoramics-and-robotic-arms" target="_d">Site Redesign, Panoramics, and Robotic Arms - X PRIZE Foundation</A>.]]></description>
 <category>NewSpace</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=59</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:36:55 -0700</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Briefs: Rutan surgery; Scaled accident report</title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=58</link>
<description><![CDATA[I wish Burt a speedy recovery from his surgery on Thursday.<br />
===<br />
Meanwhile, the report by <a href="http://www.dir.ca.gov/dosh/dosh1.html" target="_d">CAL/OSHA</a> on the accident has been released to the press (though, I can't find it on their website): <br />
/-- <A HREF="http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn13292-report-leaves-scaled-composites-blast-a-mystery.html" target="_d">Report leaves Scaled Composites blast a mystery - New Scientist - Feb.7.08 </A><br />
/--  <A HREF="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/02/07/221398/scaled-composites-explosion-investigation-points-to-oxidiser-tank-failure.html" target="_d">Scaled Composites' explosion investigation points to oxidiser tank failure - Flight Global - Feb.7.08</A><br />
/-- <A HREF="http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_8198067?nclick_check=1" target="_d">Report details deadly blast at Mojave spaceship builder test site - AP/San Jose Mercury News  - Feb.7.08</A><br />
<br />
So the exact cause is still unknown and may remain so. Charles Lurio in a recent newsletter said that one "experienced observer" told him "that there were previously no indications that an accident under the particular circumstances were even possible" and "'[Scaled’s] only crime was in not being omniscient'”. I'll note that though they are rare, there have been a handful of explosions with N2O2 over the past few decades - see this <a href="../Links/LaunchPropulsion.html#N2O2" class="linkLocal">list of accidents</a>. <br />
<br />
Charles says, <blockquote>One should note that - largely because of its ability to self-detonate - nitrous oxide has every now and then created unhappy surprises whose causes are difficult or impossible to explain. This may turn out to have been the case at Mojave. If in the end no cause for that incident is identifiable, Scaled should perhaps consider an alternative oxidizer for its hybrid; liquid oxygen (LOX) may be less convenient to transport and manage but doesn’t have nitrous’ particular unpredictabilities.</blockquote>]]></description>
 <category>NewSpace</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=58</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:05:48 -0700</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Briefs: Atlantis off to the ISS; Building a Moonbase</title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=57</link>
<description><![CDATA[Congratulations to NASA on the <a href="http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/080207-sts122-launch-day.html" target="_d">successful launch of Atlantis</a>. Hope this sets the pattern for the other <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/missions/highlights/schedule.html" target="_d">5 Shuttle launches</a> planned for this year.<br />
===<br />
Ian O'Neill posts the first installment of a series at <A HREF="http://www.universetoday.com/" target="_d">Universe Today</a> about the construction of a lunar settlement: <A HREF="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/building-a-base-on-the-moon-challenges-and-hazards/" target="_d">Building a Base on the Moon: Part 1 - Challenges and Hazards - Universe Today - Feb.7.08</A> (via <A HREF="http://www.spacepragmatism.com/2008/02/building-moon-base.html" target="_d">Space Pragmatism</A>).<br />
]]></description>
 <category>General</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=57</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:54:45 -0700</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Regarding an Atlas V for passengers</title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=55</link>
<description><![CDATA[New Scientist reports on the use of Atlas V for flights to the Bigelow stations: <A HREF="http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn13290-no-major-hurdles-to-upgrade-atlas-v-rockets-for-people.html?feedId=online-news_rss20" target="_d">No major hurdles to upgrade Atlas V rockets for people - New Scientist Space- Feb.07.08</A>. <br />
<br />
The article includes statements from <a href="http://selenianboondocks.blogspot.com/" target="_d">Jon Goff</a>, who has been following the Atlas V for people story ever since Lockheed Martin presented papers on the subject at a conference in 2006:<br />
/-- <a href="http://selenianboondocks.blogspot.com/2006/09/lm-atlas-v-man-rating-paper.html">LM Atlas V Man Rating Paper - Selenian Boondocks - Sept.18.06</a><br />
/-- <a href="http://selenianboondocks.blogspot.com/2006/09/atlas-v-for-space-tourism.html" target="_d">Atlas V for Space Tourism?   - Selenian Boondocks - Sept.23.06</a><br />
/--  <a href="http://selenianboondocks.blogspot.com/2006/09/lockheedbigelow-space-tourism-deal.html" target="_d">Lockheed/Bigelow Space Tourism Deal - Selenian Boondocks - Sept.23.06</a>]]></description>
 <category>Transport Companies</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=55</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:28:23 -0700</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Get well soon!</title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=54</link>
<description><![CDATA[As Rand reports - <a href="http://www.transterrestrial.com/archives/2008/02/best_wishes_1.html" target="_d">Best Wishes - Transterrestrial Musings</a> - Burt Rutan is having surgery today. Some of the reports from the SS2/WK2 debut last week mentioned that he had been ill recently. Sure hope everything goes well. Best wishes from me as well.]]></description>
 <category>General</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=54</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:11:00 -0700</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Carnival of Space 40</title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=53</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/">Orbiting Frog</a> hosts the latest <a href="http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/02/07/carnival-of-space-40/" target="_d">Carnival of Space</a>.]]></description>
 <category>General</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=53</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:13:37 -0700</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Atlantis set for launch today</title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=52</link>
<description><![CDATA[The Shuttle Atlantis with the <a href="http://www.esa.int/esaHS/ESAAYI0VMOC_iss_0.html">ESA Columbus module</a> is scheduled to launch today at 2:45 p.m. EST but bad weather might intervene:<br />
/-- <A HREF="http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts122/status.html" target="_d">STS-122 Shuttle Report | Mission Status Center - Spaceflight Now</A><br />
/-- <A HREF="http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/080207-sts122-launch-preview.html" target="_d">Space Shuttle Atlantis to Launch European Lab Today - SPACE.com</A><br />
/-- <A HREF="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/space/5521331.html" target="_d">Shuttle launch a go, but weather may intervene  - Houston Chronicle</A>]]></description>
 <category>NASA</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus324/index.php?itemid=52</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:17:45 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>