<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>RLV and Space Transport News</title>
    <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/</link>
    <description>News on space transport and the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
    <!-- optional tags -->
    <language>en-us</language>           <!-- valid langugae goes here -->
    <generator>Nucleus CMS v3.64</generator>
    <copyright>©</copyright>             <!-- Copyright notice -->
    <category>Weblog</category>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    
    <item>
 <title><![CDATA[McCain presses USAF on ULA block buy]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35412</link>
<description><![CDATA[The USAF is determined to go through with its big block buy of EELVs but Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is determined to make them prove it is a good deal: <a href="http://spacenews.com/launch/120203-mccain-cites-conflict-eelv-block-buy.html" target="_d">McCain Cites Conflict in EELV Block Buy Plan - SpaceNews.com</a>.]]></description>
 <category>Military Space</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35412</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 18:03:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <guid>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=35412</guid>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Remotely contour crafting a lunar base]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35410</link>
<description><![CDATA[Lunar base building looking more feasible: <a href="http://www.fastcodesign.com/1668962/no-joke-these-guys-created-a-machine-for-printing-houses-on-the-moon#" target="_d">No Joke: These Guys Created A Machine For Printing Houses On The Moon - Co.Design</a> (via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-02/most-amazing-science-images-week-january-30-february-3-2012" target="_d">Popular Science</a>) - <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.fastcodesign.com/multisite_files/codesign/imagecache/1280/slides/1-nasaposter2011-15highres.jpg" target="_d"><img src="http://www.hobbyspace.com/AAdmin/Images/SpaceLife/LunarBase/1-nasaposter2011-15highres_425x425.jpg" width="425" height="425" border="0" alt="Contour crafting on the Moon"></a></div><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.fastcodesign.com/multisite_files/codesign/imagecache/1280/slides/nasa3.jpg" target="_d"><img src="http://www.hobbyspace.com/AAdmin/Images/SpaceLife/LunarBase/nasa3_425x319.jpg" width="425" height="319" border="0" alt="Contour built lunar structure"></a></div><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center"><iframe width="425" height="246" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-yv-IWdSdns" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div><br />
<b>Update</b>: From Trent Waddington comes a link to this interesting paper: <a href="http://craft.usc.edu/CC/Welcome_files/resources/media/AAAS_Conf.pdf" target="_d">Lunar Contour Crafting – A Novel Technique for ISRU-Based Habitat Development, B. Khoshnevis et al - AAAS - Jan.2005 (pdf)</a>.]]></description>
 <category>Space Settlement</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35410</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 17:38:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <guid>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=35410</guid>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Briefs: UP Aerospace April launch; Next STIG to 120km; Jon Goff, pt. 2]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35408</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.upaerospace.us.com/" target="_d">UP Aerospace Inc.</a> says they will fly to space again this April in New Mexico: <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/UPAerospace/status/164859346998673408" target="_d">Twitter / @UPAerospace: </a> <blockquote>UP Aerospace announced today that they will launch SpaceLoft 6 on April 5, 2012 from Spaceport America.</blockquote>If you are interested in placing a payload on this or other flights, see their <a href="http://www.upaerospace.us.com/SpaceLoft-Launch-Vehicle.html" target="_d">user guides</a> for info.<br />
===<br />
John Carmack says on the <a href="http://exrocketry.net/mailman/listinfo/arocket" target="_d">aRocket forum</a> that the next version of the STIG tube rocket will hold twice the propellant of <a href="http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=35384" class="linkLocal">STIG-A</a> and should take "significant payloads to 120+ km". The rocket will require a launch permit or license since it will exceed the performance allowed within the amateur rules regime.<br />
===<br />
Here's the second part of the Moonandback interview with Jon Goff: <a href="http://moonandback.com/2012/02/03/moonandback-interview-with-jon-goff-part-2-direct-to-station/" target="_d">Moonandback Interview With Jon Goff pt 2- Direct-To-Station - Moonandback</a>.]]></description>
 <category>NewSpace</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35408</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 17:17:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <guid>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=35408</guid>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Commercial spaceflight regs: moratorium & review]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35406</link>
<description><![CDATA[Here's more about the apparently successful effort to extend until 2015 the moratorium on FAA regulations dealing with crew and passenger safety: <a href="http://www.bakersfield.com/news/local/x1997183333/Congress-acts-to-protect-space-industry-from-regulation" target="_d">Congress acts to protect space industry from regulation - Bakersfield.com</a>.<br />
<br />
Bob Zimmerman wishes the whole law would go away: <a href="http://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/lobbying-to-save-commercial-space" target="_d">Lobbying to save commercial space - Behind The Black</a>.<br />
<br />
Just to review the situation: The package of legislation governing commercial spaceflight operations with reusable space transports, orbital and suborbital, is called the Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act (CSLAA) and was passed in 2004. A lot of it deals with ensuring the safety of uninvolved third-parties, e.g. making sure a kindergarten or the proverbial bus full of lawyers' spouses isn't hit by a falling rocket. Additional regulation dealing with how vehicles should be built and operated to ensure (as judged by the FAA) the safety of crews & passengers is what is being postponed. <br />
<br />
Several space transport firms were deeply involved in the making and promotion of CSLAA. It wasn't something forced on the industry by Congress. The commercial space legislation existing at the time dealt primarily with expendable launchers of orbital spacecraft. There were also the rules governing amateur rocketry, where amateur refers to the performance of the rockets, not whether private individuals or companies are flying the rockets. Some aspects of testing and operating suborbital space vehicles also overlapped with aviation regs. The firms believed a regulatory framework had to be established for fully reusable, suborbital and orbital space transports because  many investors wanted to see one before they would provide funding. Also, there were insurers, suppliers, and infrastructure institutions (e.g. spaceports) that wanted to see it as well.<br />
<br />
There wasn't unanimous support in the industry. Burt Rutan, for example, did not support CSLAA but not because he was against any regulatory framework. He wanted a vehicle certification process like that used in aviation. The companies supporting CSLAA thought certification would be far too time-consuming and expensive for them and that it would inevitably involve arbitrary standardization since in this infant industry there was no proven standard with which to compare. <br />
<br />
So far, CSLAA seems to have worked out well. The level of pain involved in the permit/licensing process for vehicle test flights, for spaceports, etc. appears to be acceptable to those involved. I don't know of any regs that have been criticized as particularly onerous and unwarranted.  The FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) has the combined responsibilities of regulation and promoting the industry (the FAA had a similar dual role for aviation until the late 1990s). FAA/AST, for example, often sends top officials to space related hearings in Congress, public events, conferences, etc. to  speak in favor of commercial human spaceflight.<br />
<br />
However, much of the industry would still like to keep FAA/AST from setting crew/passenger rules before any commercial operating system is flying. We can certainly hope by 2015 there will be a least a couple of firms each with a couple of years of commercial suborbital spaceflight experience.<br />
<br />
<b>Update</b>: I've been informed that the term "moratorium" exaggerates the limitations in the CSLAA. The FAA can take a number of regulatory actions such as issuing advisory circulars, propose rules in response to particular incidents in licensed/permitted flights, etc. There's no outright prohibition on any and all rules regarding participant safety. It's more proper to call it a time of limited regulation and a learning period to observe design approaches, hardware, and operational techniques in action in the real world.]]></description>
 <category>Space Law and Regs</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35406</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:45:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <guid>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=35406</guid>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Briefs: Romney space shots at Newt; Not "Lunar-cy"; Romney & Eric Anderson]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35404</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jeff Foust reports that the Romney campaign continues to try to use Newt's space proposals against him: <a href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/02/03/space-hasnt-completely-faded-from-the-presidential-campaign/" target="_d">Space hasn’t completely faded from the presidential campaign - spacepolitics.com</a>.<br />
===<br />
A defense of such proposals: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-navarro-and-greg-autry/was-newt-a-lunatic_b_1246090.html" target="_d">Peter Navarro and Greg Autry: Newt May Have Lost in the Space State, but He Wasn't Just Giving Way to Lunar-cy - Peter Navarro & Greg Autry/rhuffingtonpost.com</a>.<br />
===<br />
Doug Messier talks about Romney's set of space advisers and Eric Anderson's participation: <a href="http://www.parabolicarc.com/2012/02/03/csf-chairman-anderson-backs-romney-attacks-obama-as-ineffective/" target="_d">CSF Chairman Anderson Backs Romney, Attacks Obama as Ineffective - Parabolic Arc</a><br />
<br />
]]></description>
 <category>Space policy</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35404</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <guid>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=35404</guid>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Virgin Galactic update on WK2/SS2]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35402</link>
<description><![CDATA[Leonard David hears from George Whitesides of <a href="http://www.virgingalactic.com" target="_d">Virgin Galactic</a> about the installation of the motor into the SS2, an expectation of reaching space by end of the year, commercial ops in 2013, and the second pair of WhiteKnightTwo/SpaceShipTwo is under contruction:  <a href="http://www.space.com/14465-virgin-galactic-spaceshiptwo-test-flights.html" target="_d">Virgin Galactic's Private Spaceship Ramping Up Toward Passenger Flights - Space.com</a> - <blockquote>"Over the next few months we're integrating parts and pieces of the hybrid rocket motor into the SpaceShipTwo airframe, completing ground testing of the rocket motor, and then [will] try and start powered flight over the summer," Whitesides told SPACE.com. Those rocket-powered flights, he said, will continue for some period of time.<br />
<br />
Whitesides said it looks possible "to get up to space altitude by the end of the year, if all goes well." The next major follow-on steps, he said, involve obtaining a commercial operating license from the Federal Aviation Administration and moving operations from California to Spaceport America in New Mexico.<br />
<br />
"We hope to get to space this year and our hope is to be able to start commercial operations from Spaceport America in 2013," Whitesides said.</blockquote>]]></description>
 <category>Transport Companies</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35402</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:04:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <guid>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=35402</guid>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Charles Miller writes in WSJ about lowering the cost of space development]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35400</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thespaceshow.com/detail.asp?q=997" target="_d">Charles Miller</a>, who recently <a href="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/30/10271899-to-the-moon-its-not-that-loony" target="_d">spoke with Alan Boyle</a> about a NASA JSC study into establishing a low cost lunar base using existing launch vehicles,  has an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal:  <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204652904577193501932074504.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_d">Charles Miller: Back to the Moon—For a Fraction of the Old Price: <i>Gingrich is right that America needs to retain its lead in space.</i> - WSJ.com</a> - <blockquote>In 2011, I challenged a team of NASA engineers to answer a simple question: "Can we send humans back to the moon, and to the asteroids, with existing launch vehicles?" The answer was, "Yes, we can." We concluded that it would cost about $40 billion, and that this could be financed out of NASA's existing annual human-spaceflight budget (around $4 billion) over 10 years. </blockquote>Charles proposes a way to attack the central roadblock to space utilization: <blockquote>I would add that we should target the most important problem first—the cost of space launches. Use the first year's prize money of $1.8 billion to create a Reusable Spaceplane Prize. Set the first prize at $1 billion, and the second prize at $800 million—and then get out of the way. </blockquote><b>Update</b>: Charles has a similar op-ed at Florida Today: <a href="http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012302030014" target="_d">Charles Miller: To the moon, beyond: Creation of spaceplanes key to spaceflight strategy - Florida Today</a>]]></description>
 <category>Space policy</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35400</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 02:00:31 -0500</pubDate>
 <guid>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=35400</guid>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Launch abort systems review]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35392</link>
<description><![CDATA[Chris Bergin gives an overview of launch aborts system designs with a focus on the systems used on the Soyuz, and planned for Orion and the SpaceX Dragon: <a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/02/spacex-dragon-advancing-launch-abort-system-new-heights/" target="_d">SpaceX Dragon advancing the Launch Abort System to new heights - NASASpaceFlight.com</a>]]></description>
 <category>Space transport technologies</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35392</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:58:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <guid>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=35392</guid>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Some misc. items:]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35390</link>
<description><![CDATA[/-- A photo from <a href="http://www.masten-space.com" target="_d">Masten Space</a>: <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/MdlRcktScientst/status/165099386911719425/photo/1" target="_d">Twitter / @MdlRcktScientst</a> - <blockquote>Cold flow testing the new test trailer and 3500 lbf engine. Like a boss. <a href="http://pic.twitter.com/Q31XgS8U" target="_d">pic.twitter.com/Q31XgS8U</a></blockquote>/-- A report on "squeeze suits" for space excursions and "gravity-loading countermeasure skinsuit" for countering microgravity effects: <a href="http://www.txchnologist.com/2012/next-gen-space-couture-to-feature-slimmer-silhouettes-and-new-accessories" target="_d">Next-Gen Spacesuit: Slimmer with New Accessories - Txchnologist</a>.<br />
/-- Brian Wang lists more resources and attractions to draw people into space: <a href="http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/02/bold-adventurers-will-profitably-lead.html" target="_d">Bold Adventurers and Entertaining -  nextbigfuture.com</a>Storytellers will Profitably lead the way into Space</a><br />
/-- I assume Peter is talking about <a href="http://arkyd.com/" target="_d">Arkyd Astronautics</a> (see earlier <a href="http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=30815" class="linkLocal">post here</a>) : <a href="http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/02/xprize-founder-peter-diamandis-talks.html" target="_d">XPrize founder Peter Diamandis talks Asteroid Mining as his Next Big Venture - nextbigfuture.com</a> -<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center"><iframe width="425" height="246" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nwxizEMuSB8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>]]></description>
 <category>NewSpace</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35390</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:00:40 -0500</pubDate>
 <guid>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=35390</guid>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[The Lurio Report: XCOR Lynx, SpaceX schedule; "Griffinism"]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35388</link>
<description><![CDATA[A new issue of <a href="http://www.thelurioreport.com" target="_d">The Lurio Report</a> has been released. Here is the TOC:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center"><b>The Lurio Report</b><br />
<b>XCOR’s Progress on Lynx, SpaceX Flight Schedule, Conferences, The Shadow of ‘Griffinism’</b><br />
Vol. 7, No. 2, February 2, 2012</div><br />
<i>For pricing & subscriptions: <<a href="http://www.thelurioreport.com/subscribe.html" target="_d">http://www.thelurioreport.com/subscribe.html</a>>></i><br />
<br />
<b>Conference Notes:</b><br />
<br />
FAA/AST Meeting<br />
Next-Generation Suborbital Researchers Conference (NSRC-2012)<br />
<br />
<b>Quick Updates:</b><br />
The Return of Griffin(ism)?<br />
(Un)Musical Names and Commercial Crew Solicitation Announcement<br />
SpaceX, NASA Delay Flight Opportunity<br />
___ <i>Additional SpaceX Notes</i><br />
___ SPECIAL UPDATE (February 1), Super Draco & Human Flight<br />
<br />
<b>Dear Acquaintances,</b><br />
<br />
<b>- A Perspective on XCOR’s Progress Towards Flying “Lynx”</b><br />
__ Projects Pressing Forward<br />
__ A Rugged Spacecraft to Carry People<br />
__ XCOR as a Private NACA for Space<br />
__ Evolving Essential Technologies<br />
____ <i>Nonburnite® for Tanks</i><br />
____ <i>Rocket Engines and Piston Pumps</i><br />
__ Structures and Aerodynamics<br />
__ Preparing for Operations<br />
__ Assembly, Flight and the Mark III Satellite Launcher<br />
__ Market Potential and Seeking Orbit<br />
]]></description>
 <category>NewSpace</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=35388</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:11:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <guid>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=35388</guid>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
