Skip to main content.
Space colony art: Don Davis


Mars Society Conf.
Dayton, OH
Aug. 5-8, 2010

SpaceUP DC
unconference
Washington, DC
Aug. 27-28, 2010

International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight (ISPCS 2010)
Las Cruces, NM
Oct. 19-21, 2010

Puerto Rico Space Congress
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Oct. 24-27, 2010

Commercial and Government Responsive Access to Space Technology Exchange (CRASTE)
Mountainview, CA
Oct. 26-29, 2010

Space Manufacturing
Critical Technologies for Space Settlement

NASA Ames
Mountain View, CA
Oct.30-31, 2010

2nd Int. IAA Conf. on Private Human Access to Space
Arcachon, France
May 30-June 1, 2011

Tip Jar
Regular readers can support HobbySpace
with a contribution via credit card:

NASA budget teleconference

Bolden speaks first:
/-- Emphasizes that the budget will support vigorous human spaceflight program with new initiatives
/-- Will employ as many people as Constellation does now
/-- Constellation (Ares I/V and Orion capsule) is canceled.
/-- Will work with Congress to see that the cancellation goes through smoothly
/-- Full utilization of ISS through 2020
/-- Boost commercial space development
/-- The CCDev $50M to be distributed to Blue Origin, Sierra Nevada, Boeing, Paragon and ULA
/-- Technologies to enhance space flight such as fuel depots
/-- R&D program for heavy lifter
/-- Strong science robotics program
/-- Earth observation a major priority
/-- Strong education efforts

Here is the text (pdf) of his remarks.

See also
/-- twitter.com/jeff_foust
/-- twitter.com/b0yle

Sally Ride strongly endorses the new policy direction.
- Says the prior effort was far off course.
- Robust technology development program will greatly enhance in-space exploration in the future.

Beth Robinson reviews budget details:
/-- $100B over 5 years for NASA with the $6B
/-- $600M for first year of commercial crew transport program
/-- $8B over 5 years for technology R&D.
/-- Fuel depots, autonomous rendezvous and docking, etc.
/-- A number of smaller demonstration projects
/-- Robotic precursor missions for things like in situ resource utilization
/-- ISS R&D support
/-- Commercial crew $6B over 5 years.
/-- Starts out at $500M
/-- $2B for KSC improvements
/-- Money for earth observation, climate missions.
/-- Aeronautics investments include green aviation initiatives
/-- Money for Constellation close outs over the next 2 years.

Q&A mostly with Laurie Garver
- Moon, NEOs, Mars remain long term goals but focusing on reversing decades long underinvestment in technologies that will enable affordable exploration.
- NASA will absolutely go beyond LEO, initially with a more robust robotic program.
- Was defending the commercial transport approach when I lost the audio for a couple of minutes
- Will work to reduce gap in human spaceflight launch capability
- Alan Boyle asks about HLV. Laurie says the R&D budget is very robust. Will focus on next gen launch capability. Notes that Ares V development would not have started till 20116 while this work starts now. International partners will be included. Not "restacking" of previous hardware [i.e. no DIRECT].
- Will get beyond LEO on a timetable that would have beat the prior program. Augustine panel showed we wouldn't get to the Moon to 2028 at earliest. Doesn't give a specific date for first new deep space human mission.
- Believe JSC will be impacted in a positive way by new budget.
- Lays out new programs for MSFC to replace Constellation loss.
- Looking at several Flagship missions to provide specific goals to guide the technology development.
- A discussion of working with Congress to win them over to the new initiatives
- Canceling Constellation, not canceling human spaceflight
- Don't want to just repeat Apollo missions of 30 years ago.
- Aging infrastructure needs to be updated across the various centers.
- Looking at 2016 as end of Gap but hope industry can beat that.
- Allow for manned vehicles that can fly on different rockets but depends on what industry offers.
- Looking for bids involving a wide range of technologies.
- Because $9B has been put into an un-executable program is no reason to put in $50B more.
- Looking to expand interactions with the public and let far more people get directly involved in space exploration.
- Don't want to set an arbitrary deadline for ISS lifetime.
- Will work hard to expand utilization of the ISS with a wide range of organizations.
- New technologies like Bigelow inflatable habitats open up lots of new possibilities
- Questions about Ames, Michoud and Marshall
- Non-committal on Chinese partnerships.
- Laurie believes seeing humans on the Moon and elsewhere within our lives is very possible.

Comments

how fantastical is this news.

I think I just heard that they're planning to launch a lunar soil processing mission in 2 years. they're actually planning on seeing if we can use lunar soil resources.

WTF. this makes far too much sense, could this actually be happening?

Posted by donnie at 02/01/10 13:04:49

What does Blue Origin have to do with orbital services?

Have they been keeping more under wraps than they have indicated?

Posted by Mike Puckett at 02/01/10 13:15:32

I'm with you, Donnie. It's like some kind of elaborate practical joke.

Of course, Congress will get to take its shots.

But this is a good day.

Posted by Patrick at 02/01/10 13:18:23

It's good to remember that this is a *proposed* budget. The actual budget is produced --eventually-- by Congress. The plan may change a lot before Congress is done. Still, it looks like a step in the right direction. This is one Obama initiative that I might actually like.

Posted by Tom D at 02/01/10 13:27:19

Mike,
Blue Origin has always been focused on orbital RLVs. The suborbital stuff was always meant as a stepping stone. Or at least that's what I recall from previous discussions.

~Jon

Posted by Jonathan Goff at 02/01/10 13:28:01

lol lori says one aerospace company has always said they could be crew ready 3 years after getting funding,

(you can now hear the smile in her voice)

but another major aerospace company says they can beat that...

this is what it is all about folks. friendly competition powers the strong and powers the free world.

Posted by donnie at 02/01/10 13:30:49

"Because $9B has been put into an un-executable program is no reason to put in $50B more."

Lori understands the sunk-cost fallacy.

Posted by Gary C Hudson at 02/01/10 13:35:12

Okay, I'm officially freaked out. Did 2012 come early?

Posted by Patrick at 02/01/10 13:45:52

It's all talk for now, but damn, they at least know and said all the right things. Man, it feels like the Sun has finally risen.

I know it's early, but does anyone know if the complete conference is available for download (for myself, and that I can point others to) anywhere?

Posted by Frank Glover at 02/01/10 14:20:12

Frank, it was here, good luck finding where they hide the replay though. Maybe it will loop on the same stream. http://www.nasa.gov/news/me...

Posted by donnie at 02/01/10 14:27:20
Posted by Frank Glover at 02/02/10 13:55:04

/"Notes that Ares V development would not have started till 20116 "/

What an appropriate error writing that number __don't correct it!__ lol ^_^

Everybody wins and the 21st century is finally getting here for real.

Congress must not get away with any attempts at derailing this based on party politics or allegiance or other such nonsense: the US is about to win the solar system ^_^

At the same time there will always be room for improvement as things move along, no plan survives contact with the enemy and all that ^_^ (the enemy being the challenges of space).

And to Doug if you read this: Dream Chaser eh? Eh? Nudge and high five you've got your RLV Doug, a private one too! ^_^ I like capsules a lot but I like __both__ capsules and lifting body vehicles even better, and maybe we got an orbital VTVL too (Blue Origin), and if this all takes off then maybe in just a decade there will be orbital HTHL also because this change in attitude sure has to help Virgin Galactic and XCOR and all of NewSpace in general in their private endeavors ^_^

Great decisions and it also sets back any attempts to focus only on SpaceX as an avenue for criticism (despite the existence of EELVs), any such is now more ridiculous than ever ^_^

Happy ^_^

Posted by Habitat Hermit at 02/02/10 21:56:18
Add Comment

Note: HTML code will not work except for bare URLs (i.e. http://www...). Also, for postings older than 1 week, comments are filtered manually to prevent spam and so may not appear for a few days.
Note: Trash talking and name calling, especially in anonymous comments, won't be tolerated.



wholesale
Best Aviation Jobs
Computer Help
Credit Cards
Customer Satisfaction Survey
Dish Network
Home Security
Industrial Brushes
Kamagra tablets
Metal Spinning
Metal Stampings Co
Physics Homework
Promotional Pens
Promotional Products
Satellite Broadband
Satellite Internet
Slimming Supplements
Source China Products

Blog Search

Google
Web
HobbySpace